PROPOSED METHOD🥇Majoritaire à un tour— editable below
Everything is editable — review and adjust before launching.
The decision to make
We're voting on…
Allocate things (offices, tasks…) or form pairs, based on everyone's preferences.
Side 1 — proposes (favoured by the method)
One name per line. Each gets a personal link to rank their preferences — an assignment is nominative.
Side 2 — decides (capacities)
One per line. Optional capacity after ";": "Maths tutoring ; 2" = 2 spots.
⚠️ Fill in side 1 (one name per line).
⚠️ Fill in side 2 (one name per line).
The assignment method
How do we allocate? No method is neutral — each has its biases.
🎓Two groups (Parcoursup)
Two groups rank each other (candidates and programmes, mentees and mentors…). Deferred acceptance (Gale-Shapley) produces a stable matching: no duo would mutually prefer each other over their assignment. Side 1 proposes — the method favours it; each side-2 entry can host several people (capacities).
✓ WHAT YOU GAIN
+Always a stable matching
+Handles capacities (several spots per side-2 entry)
+Ranking sincerely is optimal for side 1
✕ WHAT YOU LOSE
−Structurally favours the proposing side
−Side 2 may be tempted to rank tactically
−Some stay unmatched if spots run out
🗓 Closingmanual closing
✨ Prepare with an AI
Pick an assistant: it receives the prompt and sends you back a Placet link ready to confirm here.
The prompt is copied automatically — on Gemini, Copilot, Grok or Le Chat, just paste it (Ctrl/⌘+V).
🎓
Your system
Two groups (Parcoursup)
Two groups rank each other (candidates and programmes, mentees and mentors…). Deferred acceptance (Gale-Shapley) produces a stable matching: no duo would mutually prefer each other over their assignment. Side 1 proposes — the method favours it; each side-2 entry can host several people (capacities).
✓ WHAT YOU GAIN
+Always a stable matching
+Handles capacities (several spots per side-2 entry)